Corporate ego is one of the main reasons organizations stagnate, yet it’s often invisible because it hides behind confidence, experience and supposed excellence. Many companies don’t get stuck for lack of talent or resources, but because ego gets in the way of listening, learning and adapting to a world that demands constant change.
Comments like “we’ve always done it this way” or “we don’t need help” reveal a closed mindset that blocks three fundamentals of sustainable growth: humility, collaboration and innovation. When an organization believes it already has all the answers, it stops questioning itself. And where there is no questioning, creativity slowly dies.
Recent research on humble leadership points in the opposite direction: when leaders acknowledge limits, ask for feedback and give credit to others, teams show higher intrinsic motivation, engagement and creative performance.
Corporate ego is not just “a strong personality at the top”. It’s a pattern of beliefs and behaviors that puts the need to be right above the need to learn.
It tends to show up like this:
One of its biggest risks is self-deception. The company builds a story of greatness that doesn’t always match what customers feel, what the numbers say, or how people actually experience their work.
Management literature on hubris and CEO decision-making has repeatedly shown how overconfidence and unchecked ego contribute to poor strategic choices and, in some cases, corporate failure.
The danger is not just reputational. Ego erodes the very conditions that allow a business to adapt: honest information flow, critical thinking and shared ownership of problems.
From inside an organization, ego can be hard to name. But the symptoms are usually quite clear.
When this language is normal, the message is simple: we don’t need to learn. That belief quietly kills curiosity.
In teams without psychological safety—the shared belief that it’s safe to speak up, ask questions and admit mistakes—people stop sharing information that might expose them. Research by Amy Edmondson and others has linked psychological safety to better learning, collaboration and innovation outcomes.
When ego dominates, teams learn that it’s safer to comply than to challenge. In the short term, this may look like stability. In the long term, it’s stagnation.
Corporate ego has a very real cost on business performance:
By contrast, multiple studies show that humble leadership—leaders who admit mistakes, ask for help and seek feedback—supports higher creativity and innovative behavior among employees.
Add psychological safety to that equation and the pattern becomes even stronger: teams where people can take interpersonal risks without fear (speaking up, raising doubts, pointing out errors) outperform similar teams that lack this climate, especially on complex, knowledge-intensive work.
Ego feels powerful in the moment, but it quietly undermines your organization’s capacity to learn faster than the market.
Honest questions tend to reveal more than any survey.
Ask yourself and your leadership team:
If the honest answers point to defensiveness, avoidance of conflict, or a leadership team that rarely changes its mind, chances are ego is driving more than you think.
This shift doesn’t start with a slogan on the wall. It starts with specific behaviors and structures.
Moving from “this is how it is” to “what might we be missing?” is not cosmetic. It changes the kind of thinking your culture rewards.
Helpful questions to normalize:
Leadership has to ask these questions and stay genuinely open to the answers. If questions are rhetorical, people stop answering.
“Feel free to speak up” is not a process. You need structures:
Practical guides based on Edmondson’s work show that psychological safety grows when leaders frame work as learning, invite input, and respond productively to feedback—even when it’s critical.
If senior leaders never admit mistakes, no one else will.
Leading without ego looks like:
The research and case studies are consistent: leaders who practice this kind of humility are more likely to build cultures of trust, learning and high engagement.
Ego is often fed by narrow scorecards. If success is defined only as quarterly financial results, any challenge can feel like a threat.
To move past that, track indicators like:
Shifting the metrics doesn’t mean ignoring financial results; it means recognizing that they are an outcome of how well your organization learns and collaborates.
Some conversations about ego are nearly impossible in the boardroom. People are too guarded, too attached to roles and presentations. That’s why many companies are turning to off-site corporate experiences in nature to work on culture, leadership and collaboration.
In programs like those at Camp Santa Úrsula:
A well-designed retreat is not a reward trip. It’s a controlled environment where dynamics become easier to observe and easier to discuss. The goal is not to point fingers, but to make invisible dynamics visible and create shared language to work on them.
If you want to see how these experiences can be structured around the specific needs of your team, you can explore the corporate experiences programs and the different areas and formats for companies.
From there, what matters most is what you do back in the office: how you take those insights into the way you run meetings, make decisions and recognize contributions.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.png)
